Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Microhabitat use by freshwater mussels and recommendations for determining their instream flow needs

Identifieur interne : 000E08 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 000E07; suivant : 000E09

Microhabitat use by freshwater mussels and recommendations for determining their instream flow needs

Auteurs : James B. Layzer [États-Unis] ; Lesa M. Madison [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:1C65FB86AC38BB3B262D8FB7027E923B41FECA7E

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

A conventional application of the instream flow incremental methodology (IFIM) assumes that target organisms have specific microhabitat preferences and the ability to move to areas of suitable hydraulic conditions in response to changes in stream discharge. We investigated the use of the IFIM for determining the instream flow needs of a diverse mussel assemblage in Horse Lick Creek, a fourth‐order stream in the upper Cumberland River drainage in Kentucky. We determined habitat availability by measuring water depth, velocity and substrate at 60 cm intervals along 23 transects during low, medium and high flows. The distribution of mussels within the study site was highly contagious. Although habitat suitability curves developed from data collected on 2004 mussels indicated a clear preference for particular hydraulic conditions, the limited mobility of mussels in the coarse substrate of Horse Lick Creek implies that these curves are flow‐conditional—that is, mussels appear to prefer different hydraulic conditions at different stream discharges. Consequently, these curves are of limited value for determining conservation flows for mussels. Nonetheless, water depth and velocity were important factors limiting the distribution of mussels during base flow periods. Similarly, substrate characteristics were of limited value in defining mussel distributions; unfractured bedrock excluded mussels from portions of the study site, but mussels did not utilize all areas with preferred substrate. Because the larvae (glochidia) of mussels in Horse Lick Creek are obligate parasites on fish, data were also collected on habitat preferences of the host fishes. These data were incorporated in the physical habitat simulation system (PHABSIM) to determine the relationship between the availability of host fish habitat and stream discharge during periods of glochidia release and juvenile settlement. Unlike simple hydraulic variables, complex hydraulic characteristics such as shear stress were significantly correlated with mussel abundance for flows ranging from 0.03 to 2.18 m3 s−1. This range encompasses most flows during the period of juvenile settlement. We suggest that the high shear stress in some portions of the study site is a major factor limiting mussel recruitment. The lack of a significant correlation between mussel abundance and shear stress at high flow (9.35 m3 s−1) resulted from a variable relationship between shear stress and discharge among transects due to channel morphology. The higher shear stresses at most transects over mussel beds during a discharge of 9.35 m3 s−1 suggests that spates occurring during or shortly after juvenile settlement may result in a loss of juveniles. The unique life history and limited mobility of mussels necessitates a more complicated procedure than generally used for fish and other macroinvertebrates for determining conservation flows. Specifically, we recommend an approach that incorporates concepts of hydraulic stream ecology with the more common practice of modelling only simple hydraulic variables in habitat simulations. Estimating the complex hydraulic key characteristics can be performed with minimal effort through the selection of appropriate subroutines with PHABSIM. This approach may also be suitable for simulating habitat of other sessile organisms.

Url:
DOI: 10.1002/rrr.3450100225

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:1C65FB86AC38BB3B262D8FB7027E923B41FECA7E

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Microhabitat use by freshwater mussels and recommendations for determining their instream flow needs</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Layzer, James B" sort="Layzer, James B" uniqKey="Layzer J" first="James B." last="Layzer">James B. Layzer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>National Biological Service, Tennessee Technological University, PO Box 5114, Cookeville, TN 38505, USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>National Biological Service, Tennessee Technological University, PO Box 5114, Cookeville, TN 38505</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Madison, Lesa M" sort="Madison, Lesa M" uniqKey="Madison L" first="Lesa M." last="Madison">Lesa M. Madison</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>National Biological Service, Tennessee Technological University, PO Box 5114, Cookeville, TN 38505, USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>National Biological Service, Tennessee Technological University, PO Box 5114, Cookeville, TN 38505</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1C65FB86AC38BB3B262D8FB7027E923B41FECA7E</idno>
<date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1002/rrr.3450100225</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1C65FB86AC38BB3B262D8FB7027E923B41FECA7E/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000E08</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000E08</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000E08</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Microhabitat use by freshwater mussels and recommendations for determining their instream flow needs</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Layzer, James B" sort="Layzer, James B" uniqKey="Layzer J" first="James B." last="Layzer">James B. Layzer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>National Biological Service, Tennessee Technological University, PO Box 5114, Cookeville, TN 38505, USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>National Biological Service, Tennessee Technological University, PO Box 5114, Cookeville, TN 38505</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Madison, Lesa M" sort="Madison, Lesa M" uniqKey="Madison L" first="Lesa M." last="Madison">Lesa M. Madison</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<mods:affiliation>National Biological Service, Tennessee Technological University, PO Box 5114, Cookeville, TN 38505, USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>National Biological Service, Tennessee Technological University, PO Box 5114, Cookeville, TN 38505</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Regulated Rivers: Research & Management</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">REGULATED RIVERS: RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-9375</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1099-1646</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">10</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2‐4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="329">329</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="345">345</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">17</biblScope>
<publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>New York</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1995-08">1995-08</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-9375</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-9375</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Alasmidonta</term>
<term>Alasmidonta viridis</term>
<term>Ambloplites</term>
<term>Cobble</term>
<term>Conradicus</term>
<term>Costata</term>
<term>Darter</term>
<term>Ecology</term>
<term>Elliptio</term>
<term>Elliptio dilatata</term>
<term>Etheostoma</term>
<term>Fabula</term>
<term>Fish hosts</term>
<term>Freshwater</term>
<term>Freshwater mussels</term>
<term>Glochidium</term>
<term>Host fishes</term>
<term>Host species</term>
<term>Hydraulic</term>
<term>Hydraulic conditions</term>
<term>Instream</term>
<term>Instream flow</term>
<term>Iris</term>
<term>Juvenile settlement</term>
<term>Lampsilis</term>
<term>Layzer</term>
<term>Limited value</term>
<term>Medionidus</term>
<term>Medionidus conradicus</term>
<term>Microhabitat</term>
<term>Mussel</term>
<term>Mussel abundance</term>
<term>Mussel beds</term>
<term>Mussel densities</term>
<term>Mussel density</term>
<term>Mussel distributions</term>
<term>Mussel species</term>
<term>Neve</term>
<term>Other species</term>
<term>Pegias</term>
<term>Pegias fabula</term>
<term>Shear stress</term>
<term>Significant correlation</term>
<term>Strayer</term>
<term>Streambed</term>
<term>Streambed roughness</term>
<term>Study site</term>
<term>Suitability</term>
<term>Taeniata</term>
<term>Trabalis</term>
<term>Transects</term>
<term>Unionidae</term>
<term>Villosa</term>
<term>Villosa iris</term>
<term>Viridis</term>
<term>Water depth</term>
<term>Wildlife service</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Alasmidonta</term>
<term>Alasmidonta viridis</term>
<term>Ambloplites</term>
<term>Cobble</term>
<term>Conradicus</term>
<term>Costata</term>
<term>Darter</term>
<term>Ecology</term>
<term>Elliptio</term>
<term>Elliptio dilatata</term>
<term>Etheostoma</term>
<term>Fabula</term>
<term>Fish hosts</term>
<term>Freshwater</term>
<term>Freshwater mussels</term>
<term>Glochidium</term>
<term>Host fishes</term>
<term>Host species</term>
<term>Hydraulic</term>
<term>Hydraulic conditions</term>
<term>Instream</term>
<term>Instream flow</term>
<term>Iris</term>
<term>Juvenile settlement</term>
<term>Lampsilis</term>
<term>Layzer</term>
<term>Limited value</term>
<term>Medionidus</term>
<term>Medionidus conradicus</term>
<term>Microhabitat</term>
<term>Mussel</term>
<term>Mussel abundance</term>
<term>Mussel beds</term>
<term>Mussel densities</term>
<term>Mussel density</term>
<term>Mussel distributions</term>
<term>Mussel species</term>
<term>Neve</term>
<term>Other species</term>
<term>Pegias</term>
<term>Pegias fabula</term>
<term>Shear stress</term>
<term>Significant correlation</term>
<term>Strayer</term>
<term>Streambed</term>
<term>Streambed roughness</term>
<term>Study site</term>
<term>Suitability</term>
<term>Taeniata</term>
<term>Trabalis</term>
<term>Transects</term>
<term>Unionidae</term>
<term>Villosa</term>
<term>Villosa iris</term>
<term>Viridis</term>
<term>Water depth</term>
<term>Wildlife service</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>écologie</term>
<term>Eau douce</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A conventional application of the instream flow incremental methodology (IFIM) assumes that target organisms have specific microhabitat preferences and the ability to move to areas of suitable hydraulic conditions in response to changes in stream discharge. We investigated the use of the IFIM for determining the instream flow needs of a diverse mussel assemblage in Horse Lick Creek, a fourth‐order stream in the upper Cumberland River drainage in Kentucky. We determined habitat availability by measuring water depth, velocity and substrate at 60 cm intervals along 23 transects during low, medium and high flows. The distribution of mussels within the study site was highly contagious. Although habitat suitability curves developed from data collected on 2004 mussels indicated a clear preference for particular hydraulic conditions, the limited mobility of mussels in the coarse substrate of Horse Lick Creek implies that these curves are flow‐conditional—that is, mussels appear to prefer different hydraulic conditions at different stream discharges. Consequently, these curves are of limited value for determining conservation flows for mussels. Nonetheless, water depth and velocity were important factors limiting the distribution of mussels during base flow periods. Similarly, substrate characteristics were of limited value in defining mussel distributions; unfractured bedrock excluded mussels from portions of the study site, but mussels did not utilize all areas with preferred substrate. Because the larvae (glochidia) of mussels in Horse Lick Creek are obligate parasites on fish, data were also collected on habitat preferences of the host fishes. These data were incorporated in the physical habitat simulation system (PHABSIM) to determine the relationship between the availability of host fish habitat and stream discharge during periods of glochidia release and juvenile settlement. Unlike simple hydraulic variables, complex hydraulic characteristics such as shear stress were significantly correlated with mussel abundance for flows ranging from 0.03 to 2.18 m3 s−1. This range encompasses most flows during the period of juvenile settlement. We suggest that the high shear stress in some portions of the study site is a major factor limiting mussel recruitment. The lack of a significant correlation between mussel abundance and shear stress at high flow (9.35 m3 s−1) resulted from a variable relationship between shear stress and discharge among transects due to channel morphology. The higher shear stresses at most transects over mussel beds during a discharge of 9.35 m3 s−1 suggests that spates occurring during or shortly after juvenile settlement may result in a loss of juveniles. The unique life history and limited mobility of mussels necessitates a more complicated procedure than generally used for fish and other macroinvertebrates for determining conservation flows. Specifically, we recommend an approach that incorporates concepts of hydraulic stream ecology with the more common practice of modelling only simple hydraulic variables in habitat simulations. Estimating the complex hydraulic key characteristics can be performed with minimal effort through the selection of appropriate subroutines with PHABSIM. This approach may also be suitable for simulating habitat of other sessile organisms.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E08 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000E08 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:1C65FB86AC38BB3B262D8FB7027E923B41FECA7E
   |texte=   Microhabitat use by freshwater mussels and recommendations for determining their instream flow needs
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022